عرض مشاركة واحدة
قديم 04-06-2015, 01:27 PM
المشاركة 1954
ايوب صابر
مراقب عام سابقا

اوسمتي

  • غير موجود
افتراضي
وقبل ان نطلق البحث في حياة ال 500 عبقري واستكشاف علاقة عبقريتهم باليتم دعونا ايضا ان نرتجم ونبحث في هذا الموضوع وهو الثورات العلمية واصحابها اي الذي قاموا بثورات علمية عبر التاريخ ونستكشف هل كانوا ايتام فعلا- كما تفترض نظريتي في تفسير الطاقة الابداعية - ثم نعود للمزيد من البحث في سيرة حياة الـ 500 عبقري؟

Scientific revolutionsنقره لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة



In science, scientific revolutions are periods in progress and development of scientific thought where established theory or ideas gets thrown out, completely overhauled, or significantly modified, often owing to new conflicting experimental findings, resulting to bring about new and unexpected growth in scientific thought, typically characterized by a new branch of science. The following is a 2011 snapshot of what can be called the Goethean revolution, one that we are in the midst of or possibly beginning of presently, but do not yet know it: [1]

“Both Goethe and Gombrowicz incorporate explanations of structure into their narratives, and both make references to a chemical model of combination. ‘Gombrowicz’s novelty consists in his going one step further and perfecting Goethe’s revolution’: the character of Olek Skuziak allows him to destroy the narratives completely and put himself ‘in the position of speaking to oneself alone’. Regnault writes, on Gombrowicz’s behalf: ‘My pornography is an optic of perversions, but it is also an inversion of the art of writing, a pornology of writing’. When Gombrowicz writes of ‘persevering in obscenity’, the persevering designates the rigours of the structure, which allow one to surpass the charms of obscenity and lead to their expulsion.”


Scientific revolutions are typically measured in decades, starting on a certain year, preceded by build up years, followed by a transformation period, ending with universal acceptance. These epoch periods become known as revolutions, typically only in retrospect, when the topic or subject begins to see third party descriptions of the subject using the term “revolution”. Some of the main scientific revolutions are tabulated below:
NameYearPersonPublicationSpan

1Copernican revolution
Robert Hooke (1665)
Isaac Newton (1687)
1543Nicholas CopernicusOn the Revolution of the Heavenly Spheres270-
Leucippus (475BC)

Robert Boyle (1661)
Isaac Newton (1718)

Libb Thims | Thimsian revolution (1995)
Galileo Galilei (1592-1642)

Robert Boyle (1657)


5-Darwinian revolution
Alfred Wallace (1858)

Charles Darwin (1859)
1859Charles DarwinOrigin of Species1780-present
Pierre Gassendi | Corpuscular theory of light (1649)

Robert Hooke | Wave theory of light (1660s)
Isaac Newton | Corpuscular theory of light (1670s)
Christiaan Huygens | Wave theory of light (1678)
Albert Einstein | light quanta (photon) (1905)
1865James Maxwell"A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field"1649-present

Max Planck (1900)
Albert Einstein (1905)
Niels Bohr (1913)
Erwin Schrodinger (1926)

1900Max Planck"On the Law of Energy Distribution in the Normal Spectrum"1901-1926
Discussion
The average IQ of the "core" revolutionist, per each scientific revolution, i.e. Copernicus (IQ=190), Lavoisier (IQ=175), Goethe (IQ=230), Clausius (IQ=205), Darwin (IQ=175), Maxwell (IQ=210), and Planck (IQ=190), is IQavg=196.



In categorizational terms, in respect to a "revolutionary genius" pointing system, we note that those with two or more revolution association or roles include:

Revolutions






Person
IQTypes

IQAVG3Newton215Copernican, Chemical, and Maxwellian}
2103Einstein220Thermodynamic, Maxwellian, and Quantum3Hooke195Copernican, Maxwellian, and Thermodynamic2Goethe230Darwinian and Goethean

}


2022Maxwell210Thermodynamic and Maxwellian2Clausius205Thermodynamic and Quantum2Galileo200Copernican and Thermodynamic2Schrodinger190Quantum and Thermodynamic2Boltzmann195Thermodynamic and Quantum2Boyle185Thermodynamic and Chemical





The IQ average of the 12 revolutionists, with known IQ estimates, having only single revolution association, is: IQAVG = 189.


Related to all of this, Boltzmann, in 1886, famously postulated that the future would look back and define the century the following way:

"The nineteenth century will be remembered as the century of the ‘mechanical vision of nature’ and of ‘Darwin’s evolutionism’."




Which has indeed been the case, with Darwin and Clausius being the two big competing theories with which the modern person uses to understand his or her own existence.


References

1. Synopsis of Francois Regnault, “Optique de Gombrowicz” – Kingston University.



External links

Scientific revolution – Wikipedia.

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions – Wikipedia.