عرض مشاركة واحدة
قديم 03-22-2015, 02:29 PM
المشاركة 1941
ايوب صابر
مراقب عام سابقا

اوسمتي

  • غير موجود
افتراضي
هذا الموقع يعدد 500 شخصية عبقرية: السؤال هو ماذا لو قمنا على دراسة حياة هذه المجموعة؟ فهل سنجدهم ايتام ام نجد اغلبهم ايتام؟ ام ان للعبقرية مصادر متعددة واليتم ليس شرطا لها؟

http://www.eoht.info/page/Top+500+geniuses

تابعونا في هذا الدراسة المشوقة لاستشكاف مزيد من الادله حول سر العبقرية...

لكن دعونا اولا نترجم ما يقوله هذا الموقع حول العلاقة بين غياب الاب ( اليتم ) والعبقرية :

Early parental death and geniusنقره لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة

In genius studies, early parental death and genius, or correctly early parent "dereaction" (death) or analysis" (see: defunct theory of life), particularly scientific genius, is a salient anomaly, common to biographies of geniuses, in particular double Nobel Prize Laureates, heads of scientific revolutions, and thinkers at the top of the genius IQs listings

List
The following is a work in progress listing of geniuses who were products of early parental death (analysis or dereaction)

â—ڈ Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) (IQ=190) | father age 10
â—ڈ Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) (IQ=190) | mother age 3
â—ڈ Robert Boyle (1627-1691) (IQ=185) | mother age 3
â—ڈ Isaac Newton (1643-1727) (IQ=215) | father age 0
â—ڈ Robert Hooke (1635-1703) (IQ=195) | father age 13
â—ڈ David Hume (1711-1776) (IQ=180) | father age 2
â—ڈ Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) (IQ=150) | mother age 9 days
â—ڈ Adam Smith (1723-1790) (IQ=170) | father age 0
â—ڈ Charles Darwin (1809-1882) (IQ=175) | mother age 8
â—ڈ Willard Gibbs (1839-1903) (IQ=200) | mother age 16
â—ڈ Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) (IQ=180) | father age 5
â—ڈ Marie Curie (1867-1934) (IQ=185) | mother age 10
â—ڈ Fritz Haber(1868-1934) | mother age 3 weeks
â—ڈ James Maxwell (1831-1879) (IQ=210) | mother age 8
â—ڈ Arthur Eddington(1882-1944) | father age 2
â—ڈ Linus Pauling (1901-1994) (IQ=190) | father age 9
â—ڈ Albert Camus (1913-1960) | father age 1

A partial list of scientists, philosophers, and psychologists, common to the phenomenon of early parental death, is given in Dean Simonton’s 2002 book Great Psychologists and Their Times. [9]

EPD genius battles
Of curiosity, among early parent death (EPD) geniuses, are the battles, between Newton and Hooke in the 17th century and Hume and Rousseau in the 18th century.

Mother | Father death
One study indicated that one-third of creative geniuses had lost their father early in life. (ر؛)

The 1981 IQ study by American learning and education scholar Herbert Walberg, et al, inclusive of a research team involving 76 scholars, found that “poets, novelists, and dramatists” tend to have an absence of father commonality, whereas scientists tend to have an absence of mother commonality. [10]

Overview
One study of 699 eminent ï¬پgures showed that 45% had lost a parent before age 21. A quarter of eminent mathematicians had lost a parent before age ten. Another study of British Prime Ministers found that 63% had lost a parent, a number much higher than a comparable control group of English peers. (ر؛)


American science and medicine historian William Woodward’s 1974 article “Scientific Genius and Loss of a Parent” cites Anne Roe, in her 1952 book The Making of a Scientist, as being the first to cite the environmental factor of the death of a parent during the childhood of a scientist to one of most salient non-genetic or non-family relatedness factors behind the making of scientific genius. [3] Roe comments specifically: [4]
“One of the first things that stands out is the frequency with which these subjects report the death (reaction end) of a parent during their childhood.”


American genius and creativity theory psychologist Dean Simonton, from his 1991 chapter “When Giftedness Becomes Genius: How Does Talent Achieve Eminence?”, summarizes the phenomenon as follows:
“For both creators and leaders, the percentage of geniuses who lost one or both parents before reaching early adulthood is appreciably larger than what appears to hold in the general population or any other comparable group.”
Simonton buttresses this statement by citing Walberg, Rasher, and Parkerson (1980); Berrington (1974); Silverman (1974); and Martindale (1972), which, he seems to indicate, are just a few examples. [2]



Scientific revolutions

A large percentage of the leaders of scientific revolutions have been the product of an early parental death childhood; namely: Copernican revolution (Nicolaus Copernicus, father age 10), Newtonian revolution (Isaac Newton, father age 0), Darwinian revolution (Charles Darwin, mother age 8), Maxwellian revolution (James Maxwell, mother age 8), Goethean revolution (Goethe, blue baby; Libb Thims, mother age 12), to name a few




Dual Nobel Prize winners
Among individual to have one two Nobel Prizes, as depicted adjacent, namely Marie Curie, Linus Pauling, John Bardeen, and Frederick Sanger, 3 out of 4 have been the product of an early parental death childhood.



Discussion
American genius and creativity theory psychologist Dean Simonton argues, in his 1999 Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity, that parents who are more intelligent tend to delay reproduction until later in their existence, after their professional careers are established, stating that data shows that parents of eminent personalities were older than is the norm when their illustrious progeny were born—he gives the example of Darwin’s mother being in her 50s when she ended—and argues that heightened education level in correlation with heightened age of the parent may be the explanation for the anomaly over that of traumatic experiences, meaning that geniuses' parents were older, older people have a higher death rate, and that this explains the anomaly. [5]



This argument, however, does not seem to align with way in which elite geniuses view their situation and the great intensity and voracity about which they conduct their remaining days. German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, founder of what might be called the atheism revolution, whose father (age 36) ended when he was five, would go on to hold to a philosophy centered around the the idea of "life-affirmation", involving an honest questioning of all doctrines that drain life's expansive energies, however socially prevalent those views might be. [8] In this sense, early parental death would seem to trigger a sort of non-status quo, culturally-unbounded, orthodox-questioning energy release reaction phenomenon, whereby those activities which drain creativity and progress toward solution are strictly avoided.



Likewise, Scottish physicist James Maxwell, one of the most intellectually deep and prolific of scientific geniuses, all through his days was acutely aware of his end, as exemplified by the fact that he penned his rare inner in his last and dying poem, “A Paradoxical Ode” (1878), written in his final year as he was in the final stages of stomach cancer, as he went into his 48th year, the same age his mother died previously from the same disease.



Terminology
Of note, in regards to terminology (see: life terminology upgrades) a person is a molecule (technically a powered animate chemical) and, technically speaking (see: defunct theory of life), and molecules cannot “die” but only be formed (de-formed) or synthesized (or de-synthesized); hence, it is more scientifically accurate to speak of “end” or “termination” of a parent as compared to the defunct term “death” of a parent; a comparative example being someone speaking about the death of the water molecule H2O in a water sodium reaction. For the sake of Internet search functionability, however, in this article, the older religio-mythology term "death" will be retained in the title, over that of either the politically-neutral term "loss", which implies that something has been lost (which is a blurry conception), or the scientifically-correct terms "termination" or "end", but which are less palatable.








American genius and creativity theory psychologist Dean Simonton, from his 1991 chapter “When Giftedness Becomes Genius: How Does Talent Achieve Eminence?”, summarizes the phenomenon as follows:
“For both creators and leaders, the percentage of geniuses who lost one or both parents before reaching early adulthood is appreciably larger than what appears to hold in the general population or any other comparable group.”


Simonton buttresses this statement by citing Walberg, Rasher, and Parkerson (1980); Berrington (1974); Silverman (1974); and Martindale (1972), which, he seems to indicate, are just a few examples.
References
1. (a) Simonton, Dean. (1991). “When Giftedness Becomes Genius: How Does Talent Achieve Eminence?”, in: Handbook of Gifted Education (pg. 343); editors: Nicholas Colangelo and Gary A. Davis. Allyn and Bacon.
(b) Dean Simonton (faculty) – University of California, Davis.
2. (a) Walberg, H.J., Rasher, S.P., and Parkerson, J. (1980). “Childhood and Eminence.” Journal of Creative Behavior, 13: 225-31.
(b) Berrington, H. (1974). “Review article: The Fiery Chariot: Prime ministers and the search for Love.” British Journal of Political Science, 4, 345-69.
(c) Silverman, S.M. (1974). “Parental Loss and Scientists”, Science Studies, 4:259:64.
(d) Martindale, C. (1972). “Father Absence, Psychopathology, and Poetic Eminence.” Psychological Reports, 31: 843-47.
3. Woodward, R. William. (1974). “Scientific Genius and Loss of a Parent” (abs), Scientific Studies, 4: 265-77.
4. Roe, Anne. (1952). The Making of a Scientist (death, pgs. 84-85). Dodd, Mead & Co.
5. Simonton, Dean K. (1999). Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity (pg. 130). Oxford University Press.
6. (a) Thims, Libb. (2007). Human Chemistry (Volume One). Morrisville, NC: LuLu.
(b) Thims, Libb. (2007). Human Chemistry (Volume Two). Morrisville, NC: LuLu.
7. Dual-Laureate Similarities (Libb Thims profile) – Institute of Human Thermodynamics.
8. Friedrich Nietzsche (2011) – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
9. Simonton, Dean K. (2002). Great Psychologists and Their Times (Table 9.2). APA Books.
10. Walberg, Herbert J. Tsai, Shiow-Ling, Weinstein, Thomas, Gabriel, Cynthia L., Rasher, Sue, P. Roesecrans, Teresa, Rovai, Evangelina, Ide, Judith, Trujillo, Miguel, and Vukosavich, Peter. (1981). “Childhood Traits and Environmental Conditions of Highly Eminent Adults”, Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(3):103-07.

Further reading
â—ڈ Eisenstadt, Marvin J. (1978). “Parental Loss and Genius”, American Psychologist, 33:21.
â—ڈ Simonton, Dean K. (1998). Scientific Genius: a Psychology of Science (§: Parental Loss and Orphanhood, pg. 108). Cambridge University Press.